Dan Savage Rips GOProud Another New One PDF Print
Written by Instinct Staff | Tuesday, 26 June 2012
Tags: dan savage, goproud, catfights, meth addicts, alcoholics, compares, conservatives, republicans, gaylebrities, mitt romney, endorsement

dansavage

Dan Savage ditches the f-bomb for a different approach in his attack on GOProud this week. 

So, what is Dan saying now about the group trying to get one of the most anti-gay candidates in history elected president?

In his new impassioned diatribe, Dan compares GOProud to self-destructive gays:

I've been out for a while and I've seen my share of damaged gay dudes destroy themselves. Watching a friend drink himself to death or drug himself to death or f**k himself to death—or all three-at-once himself to death—isn't pretty. And here's something I've noticed about the self-hating, self-destructing gay guys I've known: it wasn't good enough for them to destroy only themselves. They had to destroy other gay men too. Using meth wasn't enough—they wanted their friends to use meth too. Abusing alcohol wasn't enough—they insisted that their friends match them drink-for-drink. And spinning out of control sexually wasn't enough—they wanted their friends to join them down at the bathhouse. (And for the record: having been damaged by hate and homophobia as a child explains but it doesn't excuse self-destructive behaviors in adulthood. You're responsible for the choices you make.)

Anyway, mixing it up with GOProud last week got me thinking about why a gay man would endorse—much less "commit significant resources" to help elect—a man who has pledged, if elected, to do as much harm as he possibly can to gay people. I mean, what kind of faggot supports a politician who would do him harm?

Oh, right: the same kind of faggot who would harm himself with drugs or alcohol or sex. The kind of gay men who don't like themselves or other gay people much. But while most self-loathing, self-destructive gay men are content to abuse booze, drugs, or dick, the self-hating GOProud boys abuse themselves with politics. And just like gay meth addicts who aren't satisfied harming only themselves, the boys at GOProud aren't satisfied harming only themselves. They want to harm other gay people—they want to harm all gay people—by getting Mitt Romney elected. And just like your meth-addicted friend who pushed the drug on you, or your drunk friend who mocked you for stopping at four, or your sexually out-of-control friend who insisted that you were a prude if you didn't play the come dump with him down at the bathhouse, the GOProud boys want you to abuse yourself the same way that they're abusing themselves. They want you to vote for Mitt Romney for the same reason your meth-addicted pal wanted you to use that stupid drug.

Because they're damaged.

What do you make of Dan's argument against GOProud this time around?

(Source: Towleroad; Slog)

Comments (4)Add Comment
RJTamayo
...
written by RJTamayo, June 26, 2012
That's a valid assessment. There is likely a level of self-loathing on some level among it's members. But to me I think GOProud members just love money more than they love themselves. You can never discount the green eyed monster in all of this.
Phujilala
...
written by Phujilala, June 26, 2012
I think they are fiscally conservatives but can't themselves away from the party due to ideology alignment on immigration and such. Maybe they'd like to join the liberals but that's such a dirty word for them.There's definitely a good dose of self hatred in the Party.
Uptonking
...
written by Uptonking, June 26, 2012
Sanctimonious. Immature. How is his rhetoric any less hateful than those he condemns. The F-Bomb is an ugly, offensive, historically destructive word. If Dan wishes to continue as the self-appointed voice of gays everywhere… then he needs to grow up. As his voice and words continue to gain volume and range… he needs to learn to temper the one and choose carefully the other. Otherwise he is destined to become something one tolerates – like GoProud or Act Up – fringe that makes us cringe.
0
...
written by DIck Z, June 26, 2012
There is a lot of truth to what Dan says. As I understand it, the vote to endorse Romney was anything but unanimous. This sounds like a very confused group of people to me. But, to endorse a man who does what his religion tells him to do, makes no sense to me.

Write comment

busy
 
 
 
© 2009 Instinct Magazine  |  All Rights Reserved  |  Web Site By Nathan Grimes Design