Judge Rules Catholic Charities Cannot Discriminate Against Gay Adoptive Parents PDF Print
Written by Jonathan Higbee | Friday, 19 August 2011
Tags: illinois, catholic charities, adoption, civil unions law, judge, deny, rule, discrimination, same sex couples, gay, lesbian, lgbt

catholiccharities

Take that "Catholic" charities that would rather keep orphans homeless than placing them in loving homes: an Illinois judge has ruled that you cannot discriminate against same-sex couples looking to adopt. 

The judge presiding over the case has ruled that because civil unions are now law in Illinois, "Catholic" Charities can no longer discriminate against same-sex couples.

Reports the Windy City Times:

Judge John Schmidt ruled that the state did not violate the rights of charities in in Peoria, Belleville, Springfield and Joliet when The Department of Children and Family Services ( DCFS ) denied the charities foster care contracts. The state denied the contracts because the charities had refused to place children with unmarried and civil union couples.

Schmidt issued the judgment just a day after the two sides faced off in crowded Sangamon County courtroom Aug. 17.

"The fact that the Plaintiffs have contracted with the State to provide foster care and adoption services for over forty years does not vest the Plaintiffs with a protected property interest," Schmidt wrote in the judgment. "The State may refuse to renew the Plaintfiffs' contracts."

The charities had claimed that the DCFS decision not to renew contracts was illegal under religious freedom protections and argued that they have a right to continue foster care work without compromising religious practice.

"We believe that we do comply [ with the law ] because there is an exemption there," said Thomas Brejcha, an attorney for the four charities. "To say that somehow our entities are the same as non-sectarian agencies is to say that alpha is the same as omega."

"Catholic" Charities responded to the ruling by saying the civil unions law included a religious clause protecting their right to bigotry and keeping children in need homeless; however, the court has interpreted the cause to only protect homophobic religious clergy from being forced to preside over a civil union ceremony. 

 

 

Comments (3)Add Comment
..., Low-rated comment [Show]
0
...
written by case worker, August 19, 2011
None of the above mentioned children are left "homeless" as this accusatory blog states. The reality is that this issue may seem like a win for the hundreds of LGBT couples that want to foster or adopt but it is a major loss for the thousands of children in foster care that are in stable placements that may have to move to new foster homes as Catholic Charities and DCFS have a pissing contest!
0
...
written by Anon, August 20, 2011
the case was simple. The catholic church's position was contrary to state law, so the state ended the contract. The court's ruled the state has the right to end the contract because the church has no legal right to be given a state contract and the state has the right to end the contract.

It's simple, either the catholic church plays by the state's rules or they get no monies.

Write comment

busy
 
 
 
© 2009 Instinct Magazine  |  All Rights Reserved  |  Web Site By Nathan Grimes Design