Riddle Us This: What Say You On This Quote? PDF Print
Written by Instinct Staff | Wednesday, 21 October 2009
Tags: quotables, pat robertson, same-sex marriage

rob

"I don't really believe that homosexuals want to get married. What they want to do is destroy marriage and some of the other things that we have in our society. There's been an outright campaign against the traditional moral values that have grown up in a Judeo-Christian culture. And they don't want any, any hinderance to their particular lifestyle or their particular way of having sex." —Pat Robertson

 

Comments (13)Add Comment
0
...
written by wwbjd, October 21, 2009
Pat needs to be reminded that the heterosexual community is distroying marraige and their taditional moral values all by themselves. With the divorce rate at 50% or higher, allowing same sex couples to marry will only help decrease that number. "Hey kettle, your black..."
TJarboe
...
written by TJarboe, October 21, 2009
How out of touch with reality can a person really be? I think Pat just answered that question! Why would a group of people want to 'destroy' society?! This statement is clearly as delusional as it is ridiculous!

Dear Pat, you have your morals and beliefs, and I have mine! And THAT is what America is supposed to be about! How can you say that homosexuals don't really want to be married?! I DEMAND my rights as a citizen, and until I have EVERY right and privilege that YOU do, I will not stop fighting for equality!
RJTamayo
...
written by RJTamayo, October 21, 2009
Pat Robertson speaks for Pat Robertson and no one else. It is an opinion, and an opinion is nothing more than a belief not based on absolute certainties or positive knowledge, but on only what seems true, valid or probable to ones own mind.
cherrychapstick
...
written by cherrychapstick, October 21, 2009
@RJTamayo: While I agree, his is an opinion that weighs heavy for millions of people. People who believe in his opinion.
0
...
written by GArizona, October 21, 2009
This is the very reason those fucking organizations call themselves the National Organization FOR Marriage and Protecting Marriage and whatnot. People DO believe that what he is saying is true, regardless if we all see it as bullshit.
JamesLJ
...
written by JamesLJ, October 21, 2009
Here's my two cents. I don't really have a dog in the fight over gay marriage. I'm of the opinion that the government shouldn't be legislating marriage in the first place. If two people want to enter into a religious covenant and/or a legal contract I'm in favor of them calling it what they want, regardless of their gender or sexual orientation. That said, I think the good reverend is way off base in his cynicism. He should remember the words of St Paul that "Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres." At the very least, Robertson should be giving advocates for gay marriage the benefit of the doubt that their motives aren't to "destroy marriage."
RJTamayo
...
written by RJTamayo, October 21, 2009
@cherrychapstick: Yes, there are millions who believe as he does and they will always believe as they do. There is no changing that. They are so far gone they think that is what "faith" is, and out of fear choose not to question it. But that shouldn't discourage you to the fact that there are countless others who, though not vocal, believe in marriage equality as well. Those are the ones you want in your corner, not these hypocritical losers.
0
...
written by jeffrey, October 21, 2009
It's also not at all about sex. Notice how thy always throw sex in their quotes to try to scare their underlings?
cjones
...
written by cjones, October 21, 2009
I second everything JamesLJ has stated. In addition, as much as I want to get "married" that word has come to leave such a bitter taste in my mouth. I want equality and the same rights and resources as any straight person. But if marriage means denying anyone but one man and one woman to legally or religiously commit to one another, I won't no part of that mess. And for my straight allies, I wouldn't want them to be in that mess either. If only we could just X the whole thing and get a "do-over"!
JKatz
...
written by Jeff Katz, October 21, 2009
Very well said JamesLJ!
0
...
written by Scott Vernon, October 21, 2009
But do-overs aren't an option. We already have marriage. And this debate needs to be about marriage because the word isn't going to go away. All due repsect LJames and CJones, but we have to talk about marriage, and we cannot get a do-over. That's all just wishful thinking.
cjones
...
written by cjones, October 21, 2009
Take a breath, Scott. I don't think anyone is denying what the argument is about, darling. Just broadening the topic.
KMonsefi
...
written by A GOOD Gay, October 21, 2009
Pat's a good guy, but I don't agree with him on this.

Write comment

busy
 
 
 
© 2009 Instinct Magazine  |  All Rights Reserved  |  Web Site By Nathan Grimes Design