What's Your Instinct: Was It A Good Idea For Trans-Activists To Glitterbomb Dan Savage? PDF Print
Written by Jonathan Higbee | Wednesday, 02 November 2011
Tags: what's your instinct, dan savage, transphobia, glitterbomb, attack, university of oregon, eugene, speech, mtv, welcoming committee, comments, apologize, lgbt, gay, it gets better

dan_savage

LGBT-on-LGBT glitterbombing has arrived and gay activist Dan Savage is its first victim. With cameras for his MTV show Savage U rolling in the background during a visit to the University of Oregon's Eugene campus on Tuesday, trans activists glitterbombed the "It Gets Better" creator for his notorious transphobic history. But was the activism effective?

During the shimmering attack, the activist reportedly said, “Dan Savage is a transphobe! Glitterbomb courtesy of the Dan Savage Welcoming Committee. He’s a racist and misogynist and a rape-apologist, too!”

Following the show-stopper, the "Dan Savage Welcoming Committee" issued a press statement to Portland Independent Media:

Dan Savage is a transphobic and generally oppressive rich white cis gay man who came to Eugene, OR on Halloween weekend. The Dan Savage Welcoming Committee let him know that he can't be a douche with impunity. On November 1st, 2011, an operative of the Dan Savage Welcoming Committee (DSWM) glitterbombed Dan while he was giving a Q&A at the University of Nike's Ford Alumni Center in Eugene, Oregon. During this session, the operative leapt to the stage and poured glitter over Dan's head as they shouted, "Dan Savage is a transphobe!"

As they turned tail, they added, "Glitterbomb courtesy of the Dan Savage Welcoming Committee," and just before they got out the door, "He's a racist and misogynist and a rape-apologist, too!" The operative then fled the scene. The DSWC is a memberless organization, and the only point of unity is that we have a problem with Dan Savage for anti-oppressive reasons. We encourage others who share our sentiments to let him know exactly how they feel wherever he goes. He has a huge voice due to his fame; we have to be creative to get heard over the din.

Dan himself hasn't exactly shunned the claims of transphobia in the past, though he has attempted to atone. In a recent interview with New Civil Rights Movement's David Badash, Dan says he's no longer transphobic.

"How do you disprove a charge like you’re transphobic? I’m not afraid of trans people… I certainly have had a journey in the last 20 years—as have we all—on trans issues. When I started writing Savage Love 20 years ago, and you can yank quotes 15, 18 years ago and flat them up today and say, ‘You know, that’s transphobic,’ I’d probably agree with you. 15 years ago I didn’t know as much as I know now–nor did anybody.”

There are certainly high-profile folks with even more intense transphobia that may have served as better targets for the attack, but by glitterbombing one of our own, is the DSWC instigating a conversation that needs to occur within the LGBT community? Or was this glitterbombing off-base and counterproductive?

Perhaps when Dan decides to talk about Tuesday's events, we'll have a better idea of what exactly the LGBT-on-LGBT attack accomplished.

Comments (20)Add Comment
0
...
written by Serefin 84, November 02, 2011
There is a list of at least a dozen other celebrities who would have been more beneficial to bomb. Dumb idea to attack Savage, IMHO.
..., Low-rated comment [Show]
0
...
written by Savageluvr, November 02, 2011
I can't believe that these "activists" are willing to overlook the fact that Dan created It Gets Better - perhaps the greatest modern GLBT project - in order to garner less press then they would have received if they "bombed" someone more suitable to their cause.
0
...
written by Jon Trouten, November 02, 2011
I find glitter-bombing to be juvenile, regardless of the target. It doesn't help us in the short- or the long-run, though it might feel great to do it at the time.
0
...
written by Charly, November 02, 2011
Absolutely off-base and counterproductive. I was there last night and I witnessed the "glitterbombing"--it was just a cowardly grab for attention from a stupid kid, who was trying to garner press by attacking a man who has done more for LGBT (notice the T!) rights than anyone else I can name. And what do you know, she succeeded.
0
...
written by mfks0477, November 02, 2011
Gay men are quite frankly some of the most transphobic people out there today. This act was necessary to put a spotlight on the glaring elephant in the room. Now, let's discuss why the community of gay men support the demeaning treatment of their trans brothers and sisters.
0
...
written by l'anark, November 02, 2011
to the person who there's

"a dozen or so OTHER celebrities who would have been more beneficial to bomb"

-->

Well who are they? Don't keep it a secret. If you think you have to choose the best target only, you'd never end up finding the best target. ("So many options to choose from!" said the kid in the candy store. "Now Billy, only choose one!" says the androgynous mother.)

also, im not an LGBT activist or anything but it seems better to focus not on the people who are totally crazy and homophobic (when everybody else already knows it) but to focus on the people who are just plain "acceptably" homophobic - you know what i mean? such as, the middle-of-the-road type of guy that a majority of people think is just "OK", chummity chum chum chumaroo, and yet there's something annoyingly really f*cked up about him. So point it out where you're going to get the most concerned responses. if you point out that Rev. Phelps is a homophobe, everybody you know would say "duh!" and everybody he knows would say "so what!"
0
...
written by keo808, November 02, 2011
Personally, as a gay man, I have had transphobia. Y? It's not because I was brought up with it or someone taught me to have it, it's because trans (whether sexual or gender) is not something I'm used to, physically. I know a few trans people and they have been friendly and nice to me. Of course I am right back at them, but it took time and determination to get over that phobia, just like it takes time for someone to finally decide they want to change their sex. Same thing with Dan Savage, it took him time to get over his transphobic attitude. A lot can happen in 1 year, let alone 20 years. Glitter bombing someone that's fighting for rights for the whole community is stupid, uninformed, and an attention whore. Seriously, do your research before going after someone. Otherwise, we start looking as smart as Michelle Bachman and the GOP candidates running for president.
0
...
written by Myles, November 02, 2011
I'm just totally appalled by the commenters defending Dan Savage on here. Do you have ANY IDEA the things he has said? Do you have ANY IDEA how much damage is caused when he perpetuates racism and trans/misogyny hetero/cis/sexism and rape apologism?

DAN SAVAGE DOES NOT GET A FREE FUCKING PASS BECAUSE HE IS GAY AND BECAUSE HE CLAIMS THAT HE IS A "TRANS ALLY." YOU DON'T GET TO PUT ON AN "ALLY" HAT AND THEN DO WHATEVER THE FUCK YOU WANT. IF YOU ARE REALLY A TRANS ALLY, YOU LISTEN WHEN TRANS PEOPLE REPEATEDLY CALL YOU OUT.

His behavior is inexcusable and he has shown himself unwilling to engage in respectful dialogues with other queer folks, with trans folks, with people of color, with women who are impacted by his words.

If you don't want to talk, you get glitter-bombed.
0
...
written by Jon Trouten, November 02, 2011
How is he a rape-enabler?
0
...
written by Myles, November 02, 2011
also, @keo808: you said "Glitter bombing someone that's fighting for rights for the whole community is stupid, uninformed, and an attention whore. Seriously, do your research before going after someone."

First of all, these folks have clearly done a whole HELL of a lot more research than you have since they have an actualy understanding of the depth of Dan Savage's on-going fucked-up behavior. So why don't YOU step up and do your research and check out the hundreds upon hundreds of critiques of Dan Savage from within queer and trans communities.

Second, HE IS NOT FIGHTING FOR THE RIGHTS OF "THE WHOLE COMMUNITY." I assume by "the whole community" you mean all queer and trans people. He is not fighting for trans people, he is not fighting for people of color, he is not fighting for women, he is not fighting for survivors. ALL OF THOSE PEOPLE ARE PART OF THIS "COMMUNITY" YOU SPEAK OF.
0
...
written by Myles, November 02, 2011
Third of all, seriously? You just defended a misogynistic rape apologist... USING A SLUR INTENDED TOWARDS SEX WORKERS?

SEX WORKERS ARE A PART OF THIS "COMMUNITY"

ugh. I can't even.
0
...
written by Harps, November 02, 2011
Oh, yes, definitely. Glitterbombing Savage has dragged so much trans-hating backlash out of the LGBs and into the light where we can see it. No mainstream celebrity would have provoked this kind of reaction, and frankly, it's good to know who your real allies are.

As for Dan himself? Enh, not bothered. The man can deal. If he'd been egged or slurred I'd be fucking pissed, but glittered? Pfft. It made a statement and rode on his media coverage without hurting him.
0
...
written by Uptonking, November 03, 2011
He deserves the glitter bombing. He's gotten to be something of a judgmental, pompous ass and needs a lesson in humility. I think his column has gotten to be rather limited in scope and his advice rather rote. He's not 'just' a gay columnist, but his bias' sure ring rather loudly after all these years. That said, he is a pioneer and we should be grateful for what he has done. That said, it doesn't excuse his blind spots. Also, I'm tired of hearing about bf and their relationship. Also, I think the column, in order to attract and keep readers, leans a little too much in the breeder direction. I am glad he's stopped writing his column while drinking in bars. That was a particularly unsavory practice and demonstrated poor judgment on his part. Hey - you want to wear the tiara? Then you have to walk down the catwalk and take your lumps, princess.
0
...
written by Jon Trouten, November 03, 2011
Once again, what makes him a rape-enabler?
0
...
written by Red Seven, November 04, 2011
Dan Savage, and the claims that he's a rape-apologist: http://therotund.tumblr.com/po...inize-rape
0
...
written by Myles, November 05, 2011
more rape apologism:

http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2010/10/savage-advice.html
0
...
written by This will cause a trans backlash, unfortunately, November 11, 2011
How f%@#ing misguided of the glitterbomber to target Dan of all people. I have listened to every Savage Love Podcast and he has never been transphobic. He even had trans people call in recently to say what THEY thought people should say when they first see a trans colleague after gender reassignment. So stupid and cowardly. Dan has done more for you, trans people, than the glitterbomber ever will.
0
...
written by This will cause a trans backlash, unfortunately, November 11, 2011
And also, thanks glitterbomber- now there is more debate, that I personally disagree with, as to whether transgender should even be included or have anything to do with gay rights. A lot of trans people are straight.
0
...
written by Shaed, November 14, 2011
Yes. Intra-community bigotry needs to be constantly attacked, and Dan Savage is a major source of it.

One of the main reasons he is called a rape apologist is because he called not having sex with someone because of PTSD "emotionally assaulting" them.

Write comment

busy
 
 
 
© 2009 Instinct Magazine  |  All Rights Reserved  |  Web Site By Nathan Grimes Design