Jonathan Higbee's picture

Oregon Bakers Go On Publicity Tour To Defend Anti-Gay Practices

The newest darlings of the anti-gay movement have embarked upon a publicity tour of media interviews to hide the fact that the closure of their business was caused by refusal to obey state law and not, in fact, an angry mob of sweet-toothed gays looking to be treated equally.

The discriminating duo's first interview comes courtesy of the totally impartial Christian Broadcast Network.

 

 

 

Comments

dear sir or vagina:

whoever the judge is that gave the order forcing the cake-makers in colorado to make a cake celebrating the "blessed" union of two masculivoids who each are outcasted from men enough to look at masculinity with a jagged and dumbfounded sense of curiosity and anticipation, well, he should not be a judge. cake-makers are artists, no artist should be ordered to make any specific kind of art. that'd be like telling madonna to stop embracing the anti-christ in her concerts, to stop making a mockery of the church, to stop - let me take a quote from her 1990 world tour - "breaking every rule we can".

madonna is an artist who is free to express herself in her art in any way that she sees fit. if a legitimate christian who knew nothing about madonna went to one of her shows (based on her very christian and very misleading name of "madonna"), could he legitimately complain to any judge about feeling slighted and discriminated against by madonna? could he have her cited for "false advertising," for using the virgin mary's name? he'd simply be told not to go to madonna's shows. well, cake-makers are also artists, why should they be mandated to create cake-art celebrating two masculivoids? if two masculivoids wanted a cake made for a heterosexual wedding, i don't believe that the cake-artists would have any problem with that. there are "no shirt, no shoes, no service" signs, there are dress-codes allowing the little gender to expose their baby-feeding MOMmary glands while not allowing men to expose their chests, there are discriminatory rules everywhere. just because a "man" lacks masculine gender-identity enough to gawk at masculine bodies in utmost reverence, shouldn't mean he doesn't have to play by the rules of society.

madonna absolutely will not compromise her artistic integrity, she actually used those words as a reason for not changing her show when she was ordered to. "i'm not changing my show...that would be compromising my artistic integrity," that's what she said in her "truth or dare" documentary about her "blond ambition" show. i don't think any artist would compromise artistic integrity - i certainly don't compromise mine in order to embrace homosexuality (or matthew shepard) at my website (matthewshepard.info), and it is the fault of pro-gay bigots like the aclu who are stifling freedom. madonna spits on conventional values with her art, she would never submit to anyone telling her what kind of art to make, so why should cake-makers be forced to submit regarding their creativity?

pro-gay bigots are murdering the freedom that they claim to embrace. yes, madonna is a pro-gay bigot. elton john is a pro-gay bigot who is intolerant of anything that is anti-gay. the aclu is full of pro-gay bigots, the media is teeming with pro-gay bigots, society is full of pro-gay bigots who have been brainwashed by 24/7 pro-gay propaganda. isn't the company responsible for madonna's 1990 "truth or dare" even named "propaganda films"

if the vaginas of the world are free to wear breast-baring shirts to work and men must dress respectably ("even in the summertime," taking a line from shiela e's "the glamorous life"), well, that is a form of bigotry which caters to the lesser gender. pro-woman bigots are usually on-board with pro-gay bigots, this is because feminists and gays are all a bunch of masculine wannabees who each will "neverbee" as masculine as they "wannabee". furthermore, if the much-repeated and never-justified tagline of "a woman can do anything a man can do" does not bring forth images of masculine wannabees, what does? if a "man" has a burning desire to get close and personal with a naked masculine body, if a "man" in the mens' locker room is as clueless and blind as the little boy who is always covering an eye/impairing his vision in the presence of the dancing girls in madonna's "open your heart" video, why is it so hard to comprehend gay "men" as just a bunch of masculine wannabees/neverbees?

if the cake-artists don't want to make art celebrating a "man" who doesn't possess the masculine self-esteem to regard himself as man enough to be his one and only man, no judge has a right to tell them what kind of cake-artistry to create. if elton john didn't want to play at my wedding because i am anti-gay, no matter how much i'd pay, he wouldn't play at my wedding. some musicians won't go to russia because of the anti-gay laws. and if madonna doesn't want to make art in which she repents for her valueless career by truly embracing jesus christ, would she do anything but laugh in ridicule at any judge who'd order her to?

in the immortal words of macaulay culkin, "iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii don't think so".

mr. dylan terreri, i
dr. sheldon cooper, ii
www.godhatespride.com
www.thelessergender.com
--------------------------
"When I'm hungry, I eat. When I'm thirsty, I drink. When I feel like saying something, I say it." - Madonna
www.jaggedlittledyl.com/essays
 

Crybaby Trash.

I love how they leave out the fact that this couple also baked a cake celebrating a divorce and a Pagan Solstice ceremony. Last I checked these things were also against their "Christian Values" but they did it anyway. Hypocrites!

Wouldn't they be angry if they were discriminated against just because they were straight?  You're damn right they would, and they would have every right to be.

Add new comment