Adam Dupuis's picture

New Noah's Ark Encounter - It's Got Everything. Even Dinosaurs and Unicorns.

I'm going to burn in hell anyway so here goes...

This is a shake my head, hide your children, wtf, Sweet Korean Jesus moment.  Noah had dinosaurs and unicorns on his ark.  That's right folks.  This truly explains why LGBT equality and Human Rights are concepts too hard for many to swallow - there's too much crap in the way. 

 

The new Ark Encounter tourist attraction in Kentucky wants you to think that dinosaurs were practically pets just a few thousand years ago. 

While scientists agree that dinosaurs died out some 65 million years ago during the K-T mass extinction, Ark Encounter creator Ken Ham believes the planet is only around 6,000 years old. Thus, man and dinosaurs lived together... maybe like in the Flintstones.   The Noah’s Ark he built in Williamstown features exhibits showing dinosaurs peacefully living in cages aboard the ship:

Ham, a “young Earth” creationist, explained in a 2000 blog post exactly how massive dinosaurs could fit on the ship: 

“Although there are about 668 names of dinosaurs, there are perhaps only 55 different ‘kinds’ of dinosaurs. Furthermore, not all dinosaurs were huge like the brachiosaurus, and even those dinosaurs on the Ark were probably ‘teenagers’ or young adults.”

Ham said the ark had 8,000 “animal genera” or about 16,000 in total, including some that are now extinct, like those dinosaurs.

“Without getting into all the math, the 16,000-plus animals would have occupied much less than half the space in the Ark (even allowing them some moving-around space),” he wrote. 

Along with dinosaurs, NPR reported that there were other eyebrow-raising “animals” on display, including unicorns

The fact that the displays were completely at odds with science hasn’t kept guests from enjoying them. 

Rachael Cross, who visited with her five children, told CBS News that the Ark shows actual history. 

The truth. The absolute truth,” Cross told the network. “God’s word is the Bible and it’s the absolute truth. I totally believe that.”

Critics said the Ark was a threat to kids.

Basically, this boat is a church raising scientifically illiterate children and lying to them about science,” local resident Jim Helton told The Associated Press. 

The massive attraction has been the subject of controversy, not only because it stands as a giant monument to creationism, but also for its hiring practices and tax breaks. 

Ark Encounter employees are required to sign a statement saying they are Christians and that Jesus Christ is their savior, the Christian Post reported. In addition, the site has been given $18 million in state tax incentives, something critics said shouldn’t have been allowed, given its religious nature. 

Ark Encounter formally opens on Thursday. - huffpost.com

 

 

It boggles the mind that people would think that dinosaurs and unicorns were on the ark.  I can possibly see a unicorn to be honest.  The way animals and species have been going extinct during our lifetime, it's a possibility they were on the mythical biblical ark. 

But if you ask my childhood, it'll say you should remember by heart, The Irish Rovers song.  They even knew the Unicorns didn't make it to the ark.

 

 

Would you go to Noah's Ark Encounter? 

Would it be worth a laugh?

Or do you believe dinosaurs and Noah knew each other?

h/t: huffpost.com, video from kentucky.com

Comments

+1
0
-1
[-]

Believing the Noah's Ark story was real even without dinosaurs but current existing animals is still stupid. The story is not real; not even the original. The original story is that of Ziusudra which predates the biblical version for at least 1000 years. Hebrews plagiarized the story and made a few changes.

The great flood never happened. There is evidence though that once there was a localized flood in the Tigriss-Euphrates river system and this event inspired the story of Ziusudra which 1000 years later would be plagiarized by Hebrews.

A huge Ark with all animals of the planet on it is scientifically impossible and there's absolutely no evidence of a great flood that sunk the whole planet.

+1
0
-1
[-]

"Shows actual history," my butt!  This is a completely unrealistic view of the ancient world. For one thing, while the flood may have occurred, we know that the world was smaller in Biblical times. There was no knowledge of the vast continents surrounding this area.  This is completely ridiculous!

Add new comment