Nick Robinson Says A Close Relative Came Out To Him Thanks To "Love, Simon"

Previously, we’ve discussed whether straight actors like Nick Robinson should play gay roles like his character in Love, Simon. But, at least we can be sure that Robinson is thankful for the role.

That’s not only because of the major spotlight its giving him, but also because it ended up bettering his personal life and those around him.

While on the Ellen DeGeneres show, Robinson revealed that while he was filming Love, Simon, someone close to him came out of the closet.

And who was that? Robinson’s brother.

“He came out around the same time we started filming, yeah. I think that he had been dealing with this for a long time and the timing was coincidental, but one of the best things that came out of this movie was being able to talk to him,” Nick said.

“I think that’s the strength of a film like this is that it starts conversations, and I hope it can do that for more people and start a conversation that might not have been there.”

On top of that, Robinson shared his initial hesitation at playing a gay role when he personally is straight. The actor says that after much debate over the issue, he decided to go through with it because of the importance of the film.

“It was a conversation with Greg [Berlanti], our director, we went back and forth and we talked about it,” he said,

“But I really think that with a project like this, especially today, there’s been so much progress in the last 20 years, a lot of which is thanks to you and everything that you’ve done. If you hadn’t come out when you did we might not have this movie now.”

You can watch more the interview down below.

h/t: GayTimes

Is It Time To Move Forward From Coming Out Stories?

Is It Time To Move Forward From Coming Out Stories?

Why Is Hollywood Obsessed With Sexuality?

SIMON SAYS! Okay, I’m so excited for every moment of LGBTQ screen time we may receive in film and television. We’ve experienced groundbreaking series such as Queer as Folk and The L-Word, on top of having the original and rebooted Will and Grace. As iconic as these series, among others, have been – why don’t we see many more of them seemingly recreated in film? I cannot help but feel each time a majorly distributed LGBTQ film appears – with tens across the board might I add – it’s always about a coming out story. Are you getting sick and tired of having to rewatch your youth over and over again!?

Don’t come for me just yet. To echo my earlier statement, I’m incredibly happy the LGBTQ community is getting their voices out into the world through film and television in general. I wouldn’t take back the success of LGBTQ cinema we’ve had in the last few years, but I cannot help but feel Moonlight, Call Me By Your Name, and the upcoming Love, Simon are all rehashing the same topic: Coming out of the closet or discovering yourself through your homosexuality. Frankly, I’m a bit tired of it. How many times do I have to watch essentially the same character battling his sexuality with an overbearing parent and some self-quarrel of his feelings for men? And you know, it’s not really comforting knowing allegedly heterosexual actors are portraying the gay characters we experience. Playing gay appears to gain someone a nomination from the Academy, but perhaps that’s a different topic of another day.

Yes, the latest string of LGBTQ films have been highlights for the community and the globe. However, can we please get through into Hollywood that as interesting as coming out is: How about showcasing the life of adult, LGBTQ characters who are, you know, quite comfortable with their sexuality and aren’t battling their emotions. I want to witness a strong, powerhouse, gay character who knows what he wants and goes after it. I’m begging to see someone take inspiration from the magic of Queer as Folk and put that wizardry into an Oscar nominated film. The LGBTQ community can be more impact, and more human, than just by simply coming out of the closet.

This post is the opinion of this contributing writer to Instinct Magazine. Opinion pieces do not always reflect the stance of the magazine or the other contributing writers.

Wait, Why Are We Okay With Straight Actors Playing Gay Characters?


Seriously, why are we okay with straight actors playing gay characters? This is an aspect of the entertainment industry that truly baffles me, but if any of you can enlighten me as to why this practice is still so widespread in 2018, I'm more than happy to change my mind. Because as it stands, when I think about the fact that straight people have the guts to take on effeminate characteristics when playing gay, and that we applaud these actor for the accuracy of their cultivated gayness, I get a rage within that is so intense that I want to write a post about it instead of writing about K.J. Apa's nips. And that's an intensity I never wish to experience again.

Converse to our current White House administration, society has never been more woke than in 2018. We even have the word "woke." And everything about this wokeness feels as though the co-opting of gay culture would be frowned upon. An increasing number of people understand the importance of correct pronoun usage when addressing trans people. Through the #MeToo and Time's Up movements, we are overhauling the way women are treated in Hollywood, and across all industries. Black Panther's $1 billion international box office haul has ushered in the era of the bankable black superhero. Katy Perry has short hair. Katy Perry has short hair people!

In 2018 we are emphasizing the importance of diversity and addressing the injustices facing many marginalized groups. Representation is a key factor in equality, and projects such as Lady Bird - one of the few Best Picture Oscar nominees ever to be directed by a woman - only underscore the importance of diversity. But you know what's not diverse? A straight man playing a gay man.



Here's another way to break this down. One of everyone's favorite fun facts is that during Shakespeare's time, male actors played female roles exclusively. This practice evaporated once women proved capable of acting and society allowed them to do it. White actors used to appear in blackface to play racist caricatures of black people. This little acting gem obviously fell by the wayside, but existed in part up until the 2000's. You can see a very condensed history of blackface here. Before actors were able to come out as gay without the threat of being blacklisted, straight, or "straight," actors played gay roles.

But now we have gay actors. Capable of playing gay roles. What am I missing? It's 2018 and we're celebrating Timotheé Chamalet's bravery in licking Hammer's face in Call Me By Your Name? We're encouraging youths to watch straight actor Nick Robinson play a confused gay teen in Love, Simon, when really the message is that a gay teen is only worthy of our attention if he's portrayed by a straight actor? Hey Simon, I don't love you.

I've heard people defend the casting of straight actors in gay roles by pointing to the fact that their star power can help a project flourish in a way that a lesser known gay actor couldn't. I've also heard people say that we don't have the talent pool of openly gay actors yet necessary to fill all the roles. To which I say, sure. Never met a gay actor in my life. What would that even look like. A gay man in theater or cinema? Can't, compute. Systems, down. 

The past few years have brought some true bright spots - with homosexual hotties Wentworth Miller and Russell Tovey taking on a romantic storyline on the The Flash and fellow out actors Charlie Carver and Colton Haynes sharing a passionate moment on Teen Wolf. But for every success, there's a Dallas Buyers Club, and I just can't stand it anymore. I just can't. Straight actors leverage gay roles as Oscar bait, but it's the struggles of real gay people that have made these roles so compelling and so multifaceted, and to swoop in at the last minute and co-opt that is unfathomable. It's, dare I say, un-woke.

This post is the opinion of this contributing writer to Instinct Magazine.  Opinion pieces do not always reflect the stance of the magazine or the other contributing writers.