Home
Trans People Likely Shut Out of ENDA PDF  | Print |  EMail
Written by Alex Cho   
Tuesday, 06 November 2007

Image
Mass. Rep. Barney Frank
The controversy over the inclusion of protections for trans people in the federal Employment Nondiscrimination Act continues on. For those who haven't been following this story, it's a huge deal: the act would make it illegal for an employer to discriminate in the hiring, firing, promotion, or pay for someone based on their sexual orientation.

Openly gay Massachusetts representative removed the words "gender identity" from the bill's original wording, saying he feared it would not make it out of committee. An amendment was proposed to include trans people after the bill made it to the floor by openly lesbian Wisconsin representative Tammy Baldwin, but as of today, lawmakers fear there will not be enough votes to add the amendment to the legislation.

This has drawn deep debate from within the LGBT community for ostensibly sacrificing the rights of one portion of the community in order to advance others'. From 365gay.com:

Tuesday, however, it appeared there are not the votes to pass an all inclusive version of ENDA and in an open letter to members of Congress, HRC, the NAACP, the National Education Association, the United Auto Workers, The AFL-CIO, the National Employment Lawyers Association, the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, the American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees and a number of other groups said they would support ENDA without gender identity.

The letter adds:

"While we are greatly disappointed that the current version of ENDA is not fully inclusive, our sense of frustration in this case is directed at those who would clearly prefer to see no one from the gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender community protected at all."

This is the first time in over 30 years since the bill was first introduced that it has actually made it to the House floor for a full vote.




Link to this...
Digg!Del.icio.us!Facebook!StumbleUpon!
Comments (1)add feed
...
written by Regina Fillangi on November 06, 2007

None of this matters because Bush is going to Veto it and there is no way we have enough votes to override the veto on this kind of bill.

Tell us what you think, people! If your comments are posted, we reserve the right to use these comments in our Interaction (Letters) section of the published magazine. If your comments are published in the magazine, we may edit your comments for length or clarity. Thank you!
password
 

busy